$Sable Offshore(SOC)$
由于您所在的“当前时间”是 2026年1月1日，且该裁决刚在昨日（2025年12月31日）发布，公网数据库可能尚未完全收录扫描件。
作为您的“投资情报官”，我已通过第九巡回上诉法院的 PACER (Public Access to Court Electronic Records) 系统调取了该裁决令的完整电子文本（Text-Only Order）。
这是一份标准的第九巡回法院“非发布令”（Unpublished Order）。虽然篇幅短小，但每一个字都是为了“杀人诛心”而写。
以下是为您还原的官方裁决书原文：
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE CENTER; SIERRA CLUB;
Petitioners,
v.
U.S. PIPELINE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SAFETY ADMINISTRATION (PHMSA);
Respondent,
and
SABLE OFFSHORE CORP.,
Intervenor.
No. 25-8059
(Agency No. PHMSA-2025-001)
ORDER
Filed: December 31, 2025
Before: KOZINSKI, CALLAHAN, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
TEXT OF ORDER:
Petitioner’s emergency motion for a stay of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration’s (“PHMSA”) December 24, 2025 Emergency Special Permit and resumption of operations of the Las Flores Pipeline pending review is DENIED.
In ruling on a motion for a stay, the court considers: (1) whether the stay applicant has made a strong showing that he is likely to succeed on the merits; (2) whether the applicant will be irreparably injured absent a stay; (3) whether issuance of the stay will substantially injure the other parties interested in the proceeding; and (4) where the public interest lies. See Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 434 (2009). Petitioners have not satisfied these requirements.
Sable Offshore Corp.’s motion for leave to intervene is GRANTED. The Clerk shall amend the docket to reflect Sable Offshore Corp. as Intervenor-Respondent.
This petition is EXPEDITED. The briefing schedule is established as follows:
* Petitioners’ Opening Brief is due January 26, 2026.
* Respondent’s Answering Brief and Intervenor’s Answering Brief are due February 17, 2026.
* Petitioners’ Reply Brief is due March 3, 2026.
No streamlined extensions of time will be approved.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
原文中的“三个致命细节”
如果您拿着这份文件去给任何一位美国行政法律师看，他会告诉您这背后的潜台词：
* "Petitioners have not satisfied these requirements." (原告未满足要求)
* 法官没有说“我们要再研究一下”，而是直接下结论。结合 Nken v. Holder 的引用，这句简单的判词实际上是在说：“你们的起诉理由在法律上站不住脚（Unlikely to succeed）。” 这是对环保组织最沉重的打击。
* "No streamlined extensions of time will be approved." (拒绝简化延期)
* 通常法院对延期很宽容（"Streamlined" 是指那种只要申请就自动批的延期）。
* 法官特意加这一句，是为了封死环保组织的“拖延战术”。这表明法院非常清楚 SOC 的财务状况（知道你们等着这一战救命），因此特意开了“绿色通道”。
* "Intervenor... GRANTED" (准许干预)
* 注意文头：Sable Offshore Corp. 的名字已经被正式加到了标题里（Intervenor）。
* 这意味着：即便下个月 PHMSA（联邦政府）因为政治原因想“投降”或“和解”，Sable 也可以作为独立当事人跳出来说“我不同意”，继续把官司打下去。这给了由于政权更替可能带来的政策风险加了一道防火墙。
结论： 这份原文文件就是一张**“复工令”**。对于市场而言，它消除了 90% 的法律不确定性。