用户头像
入夜42
 · 美国  

$谷歌A(GOOGL)$ 某种意义上是OpenAI合纵连横一锅端风险的对冲。
命门一直是谁能更好地服务最大规模、最广泛的终端用户(C+B+G),为世界贡献最大额的净增益。
老马的$特斯拉(TSLA)$ 如果合并XAI,字节bytedance也有潜力。
这是10万亿美元市值的race。//@入夜42:The Timing Paradox 时间悖论
But here’s the challenge Altman faces: Morgan had decades to build his position. The Panic of 1907 came after thirty years of Morgan consolidating power in American finance. Altman is trying to compress that timeline into two or three years.
但这是 Altman 面临的挑战:摩根花了数十年时间来建立他的地位。1907 年的恐慌是在摩根在美国金融界巩固权力三十年后发生的。Altman 试图将这个时间线压缩到两三年内。
Technology cycles faster than railroads or banking ever did. Models that seem dominant today face commoditization within quarters, not decades. Infrastructure that takes years to build may be obsolete by the time it’s operational. The bubble that’s funding this entire play could pop before the dependencies become truly unbreakable.
技术迭代的速度比铁路或银行业任何时候都快。今天看似主导的模型可能在几个季度内面临商品化,而不是几十年。需要数年才能建成的基建,可能在投入运营时就已过时。支撑这一切的泡沫可能在依赖关系变得真正不可打破之前就破裂。
Google represents the counterstrategy: vertical integration without dependency. Own the chips (TPUs), own the data centers, own the models, own the distribution (Android, Chrome, Search). If you depend on no one, you can’t be leveraged. They’re playing the game Morgan’s adversaries wished they could have played—just own everything yourself.
谷歌代表了一种反策略:垂直整合而不依赖。拥有芯片(TPU),拥有数据中心,拥有模型,拥有分发渠道(Android、Chrome、搜索)。如果你不依赖任何人,你就无法被利用。他们正在玩摩根的对手们希望他们能够玩的游戏——只需自己拥有一切。
The race is whether Altman can build the Trust before:
这场竞赛是看阿尔特曼能否在之前建立这个信托
Models commoditize enough that the API layer loses pricing power
模型商品化程度足够高,以至于 API 层失去了定价能力
Capital markets sober up and cut off funding
资本市场清醒并切断资金
Google’s vertical integration proves superior
谷歌的垂直整合证明其优越性
The tech ecosystem recognizes the game and revolts
科技生态系统认清游戏规则并反叛

@入夜42 :网页链接
OpenAI's Money Trust: Engineering Systemic Risk as Strategy
OpenAI 的金钱信托:将系统性风险作为策略来构建